Egypt & Africa
Ethiopia Expels an Egyptian Diplomat to Hide a War It Is Losing
Drones are reaching Addis Ababa, Eritrea has cut ties and Abiy Ahmed’s answer is to blame Egypt without evidence. Cairo’s same-night expulsion of an Ethiopian counsellor was a warning: the next step is ambassadors.

In this article
Ethiopia expels Egypt’s diplomat, and Cairo answers overnight
Ethiopia’s foreign ministry announced on the evening of October 1, Cairo time, that an Egyptian diplomat in Addis Ababa, Ahmed Moharam Ahmed Soliman, was persona non grata and had 48 hours to leave the country. It cited the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and gave no reason. Egypt’s foreign ministry did not wait for morning. Within hours it declared a counsellor at the Ethiopian embassy in Cairo persona non grata and gave him the same 48 hours, The National reported.
A senior Egyptian official told the state news agency MENA that Ethiopia’s move was “unfortunate” and “unjustified”, and that Egypt “firmly rejects interference in the internal affairs of other countries,” according to Ethiopia Observer.
On a news bulletin this is one sentence: Ethiopia expelled an Egyptian, Egypt expelled an Ethiopian. Behind it sits a military, diplomatic and economic crisis, and the expulsion is not its last chapter.
Key takeaways
Ethiopia expelled a junior Egyptian diplomat with no stated reason and no evidence because it cannot explain why rebel drones are hitting its own capital.
Egypt replied the same night by expelling a more senior Ethiopian, the embassy’s counsellor. The message is that every further step will cost Addis Ababa more than it costs Cairo.
The African Union, headquartered in Addis Ababa, refused to repeat Ethiopia’s accusation. That is a diplomatic failure for Abiy Ahmed.
Abiy is losing control at home and manufacturing foreign enemies to cover it. Win or lose against the rebels, the road leads to more escalation with Eritrea and Egypt.
A capital under drone fire
The expulsion only makes sense against what is happening inside Ethiopia. On September 23 a coalition of seven armed groups, led by the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) and including Fano militias from Amhara and groups from Afar, Somali and Benishangul-Gumuz regions, launched an offensive aimed at removing Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s government. It calls itself the Ethiopian Peoples’ Forces Alliance for Survival.
The war has reached the capital. On September 27 a drone struck the Debre Zeit (Harar Meda) air base in Bishoftu, southeast of Addis Ababa, while Abiy was at the compound for a holiday celebration. On September 30 the national intelligence service banned all drone flights over Addis Ababa. Hours later, in the early morning of October 1, explosions were heard in the capital as suicide drones targeted the military command headquarters in the Tor Hailoch area and the 24th Infantry Division’s base in Kirkos district. Another drone came down in the 4 Kilo area, home to diplomatic premises. It was not the first night of strikes on the city. A source in the rebel alliance told Reuters it had carried out several drone strikes on Addis Ababa, including on the military’s headquarters.
The target says a great deal. Satellite images of the defence headquarters show a compound that looks more like a football stadium than a Pentagon, and a drone that crossed hundreds of kilometres of government-held territory still reached it.
When rebels can strike the defence headquarters in the capital, the government has lost control. Investors stop coming to a country that already defaulted on its foreign debt in 2023. Embassies and the African Union, which has its headquarters in Addis Ababa, start counting the risk to their staff. Ethiopian Airlines, which sells itself as Africa’s best airline, has to explain how its hub is safe from drones that can reach an army headquarters. If this is happening in the capital, imagine the rest of the country.
The foreign governments are already moving. Israel’s foreign minister, Gideon Sa’ar, worked with Ethiopian officials to get stranded Israelis out of the north, and about 45 Israelis trapped in Lalibela were flown out by helicopter over several days. The rest of the Israeli presence will follow, and other countries will draw the same conclusion.
The army is stretched too. Ethiopia is pulling more than 3,000 troops out of Somalia, out of a force of roughly 5,000 to 7,000, to fight the rebels at home, Bloomberg reported. Government forces say they are advancing on Mekelle, the Tigrayan capital, and pro-government footage shows a march to “liberate” Tigray. That is a show. The Tigrayan forces have not collapsed in a few hours, and the proof is that the capital is under fire. Fano fighters have captured Ethiopian colonels and their units in North Wollo. An army that is winning does not lose officers by the column.
Blaming Eritrea, then Egypt
Instead of fixing its own problems, Addis Ababa looked abroad. Abiy turned his army outward, toward Sudan’s war, where a Yale research lab found an Ethiopian base in Asosa supporting the Rapid Support Forces, and neglected the home front until the rebels rose against him. Rather than admit that, his government blames Eritrea.
On October 1 Ethiopia closed its embassy in Asmara over what it called Eritrea’s “direct and indirect acts of hostility and belligerence,” and ordered 10 Eritrean diplomats to leave within 48 hours. Eritrea answered that it had “no option but to reciprocate in kind and sever all diplomatic ties with Ethiopia,” Al-Monitor reported.
The dangerous part is that Ethiopia did not stop at Eritrea. Days earlier its army chief, Field Marshal Birhanu Jula, had named Sudan and Egypt among Ethiopia’s “historical and contemporary adversaries,” casting Eritrea as the go-between and arguing that the TPLF and Eritrea could not threaten Ethiopia without outside backing. The logic is plain: the rebels are hundreds of kilometres from Addis Ababa, Eritrea does not have drones that reach the capital, so someone must be paying. Ethiopia wants that someone to be Egypt. Egypt’s foreign ministry spokesman replied that Egyptian policy rests on “noninterference in the internal affairs of other countries,” and Sudan’s army called the accusation baseless.
Then the accusation became an act. Ethiopia is no longer only talking about Egypt; it has moved against Egypt’s diplomatic mission.
Analysis
Three things about Ethiopia’s expulsion
First, Ethiopia gave no reason. It did not say the diplomat was caught spying, meeting rebels or helping Eritrea. It did not say he did anything. It gave no reason because it has no evidence. The expulsion is the accusation, made without having to prove it.
Second, it did not expel the ambassador or his counsellor. It chose a staff member with no senior title, a man whose name is hard to find in the Egyptian mission’s public record. That is the kind of person who is easy to label a spy and whose expulsion sounds believable: someone new, someone about to leave, someone without rank to defend him. The expulsion was a staged gesture, a message aimed at the cameras.
Third, 48 hours is short. A month’s notice signals a dispute that can still be managed. A week is serious. Forty-eight hours means the man barely has time to pack, and he is a diplomat with contacts and obligations. It is a deliberately hostile timeline, one step short of the 24 hours reserved for the gravest cases.
Analysis
Egypt’s reply was a warning
Cairo’s answer was faster and heavier. Ethiopia expelled a minor staff member; Egypt expelled a counsellor, usually the second- or third-ranking figure in an embassy. The Ethiopian mission in Cairo lives comfortably and would like to stay. Losing its counsellor is a serious blow. The message is simple: expel anyone else from our mission, and your ambassador is next.
The way Egypt spoke matters as well. The harsh words came from an unnamed “Egyptian official”, not a formal statement. That is a familiar tool. An official speaking to the press can say what a formal statement cannot, and Cairo keeps room to escalate.
Analysis
Why Ethiopia always blames Egypt
Ethiopia has played this card before. In October 2016, during the Oromo and Amhara protests that led to a state of emergency, Addis Ababa blamed “foreign enemies”, pointed at Egypt and Eritrea, and summoned Egypt’s ambassador over a video. Whoever rises against an Ethiopian government, Addis Ababa says Egypt is behind it.
There is a reason. On the Nile, Ethiopia is the aggressor. Egypt has the facts and evidence that its share of Nile water is being taken by the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and the three new Blue Nile dams Ethiopia announced this summer. On that file Ethiopia has no case. So it moves the fight to a file where accusations are easy: Egypt destabilising Ethiopia, Egypt as the villain, Egypt dragged into a war that is not its war.
An Egyptian proverb fits: nobody saw them stealing, but everyone saw them dividing the loot. Ethiopia knows it took Egypt’s water. So whenever something goes wrong at home, it cries that Egypt is striking back.
The accusation also collapses on its own terms. These rebels already match the Ethiopian army in skill; they have taken large numbers of its soldiers prisoner. What they lack is weapons. If Egypt were arming them, they would be inside the presidential palace by now and Abiy would not be sitting in his office. If Cairo wanted to act, it would not need anonymous diplomats and drones; it would go after Abiy himself. Egypt says it does not back these groups. Silent Dossier’s view is that it should.
Even if this diplomat were a spy, Ethiopia could not prove it. Egypt’s intelligence service is far more capable than Ethiopia’s. He is not a spy. Ethiopia wanted to send a message, and it did so with the only tool it had.
What Abiy needs is a big foreign enemy so that Ethiopians rally around the flag. He does not want to admit that Tigrayan and Amhara fighters are taking his soldiers prisoner on their own. Blaming a regional power makes the rebellion look like a foreign plot.
Analysis
The African Union did not take Ethiopia’s side
Ethiopia hosts the African Union, and still the AU would not repeat its charge. The AU Commission called on Ethiopia, Eritrea and Egypt to exercise “maximum restraint” and settle their differences through diplomacy. It did not accuse Egypt of destabilising Ethiopia. It did not accuse Eritrea. It did not even mention Sudan, the third country Ethiopia blames. It is a weak statement, but for Addis Ababa it is a failure: the organisation in its own capital looked at the evidence and found nothing worth repeating.
The statement does link Egypt and Eritrea, and for a reason. Egypt has built a strategic partnership with Asmara, including a 2024 summit with Eritrea and Somalia to coordinate on security, and Red Sea security arrangements since. If Abiy moves on Eritrea, Egypt is part of the equation. The AU appears to see a confrontation coming.
Analysis
Abiy loses either way
If Abiy loses this war, it is a catastrophe for him. If he wins, it is a bigger one, because a victorious army will want to march on Eritrea. His diplomatic moves against Asmara already point there.
The timing deserves attention. All of this is happening while the Houthis are active in Yemen, Saudi Arabia wants a coalition against them and Washington wants one too. Abiy wants a coastline on the Red Sea. Politics rarely runs on coincidence.
There are three explanations for the army’s humiliation, with whole units captured. Either Abiy deliberately starved front-line units of supplies so they would fall, giving him a pretext to blame Eritrea; or he is simply failing and has lost control; or he is using the chaos to prepare a move on Eritrea. Every one of them is a disaster for the region. Ethiopia is a state collapsing from within and importing enemies from abroad because it has no evidence and no time to make any. Israel’s growing role in this scenario is another sign that something unnatural is happening in Ethiopia. Ethiopia, and the region, would be better off rid of Abiy Ahmed.
Egypt’s patience is not weakness
Cairo has been clear. President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi said at the end of September that Egypt will give diplomacy the widest possible space, but not “at the expense of Egypt’s existence and its people,” Egyptian Streets reported. Giving diplomacy the widest space means Egypt is capable of military action and is choosing patience.
Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty went further. Egypt will not accept a single drop of its water share being affected by one country’s will. Any additional dams or unilateral actions will not be accepted or allowed, he said, a position he called consistent with the international law governing transboundary rivers. Water security, in his words, is “a matter of life or death.”
Do not expect the escalation to stop at counsellors. Egypt and Ethiopia are on a dangerous path, and the next step on it is ambassadors. Egypt has avoided three wars in the region by choice. Ethiopia’s collapse is the one most likely to test that restraint.
- Ethiopia
- Egypt
- Abiy Ahmed
- Eritrea
- Tigray
- Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam
- African Union
- Badr Abdelatty
Share this article
Follow Silent Dossier
New articles and corrections are posted on our official accounts.
Related



