Skip to reading content
SSearch

Europe & Russia

Why Did Europe Refuse a G20 Photo With Lavrov?

G20 Atlanta: Europe Refuses a Photo With Lavrov, and Kallas Calls His Case Lies

Europe refused a G20 photo with Lavrov in Atlanta, and Kallas said he spoke lies. What Lavrov, Rubio, Sikorski, Wadephul and Kallas said, and what to watch.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov speaking at a lectern in a file photograph
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who attended the G20 foreign ministers’ meeting in Atlanta on 30 and 31 October 2026. The photograph is an undated file image, not from the meeting.Photo: Russian Foreign Ministry (Eduard Pesov) / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0
In this article

Context

The traditional group photograph of G20 foreign ministers was cancelled in Atlanta on Friday 30 October. Several European ministers had said they would not stand beside Russia’s Sergey Lavrov, and some threatened to walk out. By the end of the two day meeting, Lavrov had called the episode an “arrogant boycott”, while the EU’s foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said he had delivered “a lot of lies” at the table.

Aerial view of the downtown Atlanta skyline under a bank of cloud
Atlanta, Georgia, where the United States hosted the G20 foreign ministers’ meeting (aerial file photo, February 2026).Photo: WMrapids / Wikimedia Commons, CC0

Key takeaways

Two US officials, speaking anonymously, said Secretary of State Marco Rubio cancelled the photo because the argument would become a distraction. Poland, Germany and the United Kingdom each stated publicly why they would not pose with Lavrov. Lavrov answered by blaming Europeans for blocking earlier peace proposals. Kallas said Russia must show “with their deeds” that it is ready to negotiate. A new round of Moscow, Kyiv and Washington talks is expected next month.

What each side said

Rubio, the host, opened the meeting on Friday: “We are in a critical moment, I would call it a moment of choosing,” he said, and described “a series of interconnected economic and geopolitical crises”. He hoped for “a productive meeting”.

Official portrait of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in front of a US flag
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, host of the Atlanta meeting (official portrait, January 2025).Official U.S. Department of State portrait, public domain

Poland’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski told reporters in Atlanta that cancelling it was “the right decision”. He added: “I am not the only one who does not want to be photographed with Lavrov.” Germany’s Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said: “There will definitely not be a family photo in which our European partners are together with Mr. Lavrov.” He also said “there is no normality with Russia”, but that “we must exchange the controversies at the table here”. The UK Foreign Office said it “has a longstanding policy not to have direct, bilateral engagement with Russian ministers”.

Lavrov told reporters after meeting Rubio: “Yes, we had a decent talk, though a short one, because for understandable reasons he has a lot of duties as the host.” He called the European stance an “arrogant boycott” and blamed the “outrageous activity of Europeans” for undermining earlier peace proposals on Ukraine that Russia had backed. He praised the Trump administration as the only Western government so far to recognise the “root causes” of the Ukraine conflict.

Kallas, who sat at the table with him, put it differently: “Of course, he put forward a lot of lies, a lot of false narratives that we were also able to then rebuke,” she said. On whether Moscow wants peace: “They should show with their deeds that they are ready to negotiate, but they are clearly, clearly not.” She said July, August and September were the deadliest months for civilians in Ukraine, and that European officials had agreed not to normalise their presence around international platforms after the invasion began. “We haven’t changed our policies,” she said. She called for continued pressure on Moscow, in particular for a Black Sea ceasefire.

Analysis

The order of events

On the same Friday the US State Department announced approval of a sale of 500 Patriot missiles to Ukraine, which we covered in our report on the $2.1 billion PAC-3 package. Ukraine itself was not at the table: US officials limited the invitations to formal G20 members.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said before the meeting that Lavrov would lead a delegation to “promote Russian ideas, aimed at strengthening the foundations of a multipolar world”.

Analysis

Why does a G20 family photo matter?

The cancellation answers one question: who is willing to be pictured beside whom. Sikorski said he did not want to be photographed with Lavrov. Wadephul said there was no normality with Russia. Kallas said the European line on not normalising Russia’s presence had not changed since the invasion. Each statement ties the refusal to the war, and none asks for Russia to be removed from the table. Wadephul said the controversies had to be exchanged there.

Lavrov turned the same event around. He praised Washington’s readiness to engage and placed the blame for failed peace proposals on Europeans, on the day the US State Department announced the Patriot sale. Silent Dossier’s reading is that the split inside the Western camp is the real story: Washington kept Russia in the room and dropped a photograph, and the Europeans kept their position.

Putin has already spoken of readiness for war with Europe, which we examined in why Putin said Russia is ready for war with Europe. The European Union case in Kallas’s words rests on conduct: civilian deaths in Ukraine, not Russian assurances.

What to watch

The next negotiating round. Lavrov said talks would go ahead, and Kallas said Russia was clearly not ready. Whether Moscow, Kyiv and Washington meet next month, and who attends, tests Lavrov’s account against Kallas’s. The leaders’ meeting in Miami in December. The G20 leaders’ summit is to be hosted by President Trump. A head of state in the frame would raise the photograph question again. Civilian casualty figures for October. Kallas pointed to July, August and September as the deadliest months for civilians in the Ukraine war. October’s figures are the next test of her claim. Further Patriot deliveries. The approval is a sale. Dates for the first deliveries come next.

Share this article

Follow Silent Dossier

New articles and corrections are posted on our official accounts.

Silent Dossier on Google

Add Silent Dossier as a preferred source on Google (opens in a new tab)Follow us in Google Discover